Posts Tagged ‘love’

Freudenschade

Friday, December 12th, 2008

I’ve taken an unfortunate scapegoat approach to pinpointing romantic shortfalls. Common sense indicates that I am single because I’m the one in control. It’s much easier, though, to blame everyone else, and I do that to an astonishing degree. Facebook indicates you have a new flame? You’re holding hands on the street? You’re walking slightly abreast of someone of the opposite sex? Then you are the cause of everything that makes me miserable, and I will secretly want to take an axe to your face in lieu of leaving my apartment and meeting people. Count on it. Good lord, I’m a cranky 70 year-old 45 years too early.

Unlike schadenfreude—’taking pleasure in the misery of others,’ literally ‘pain pleasure’ in German—there is no word to describe this sensation. Jealousy or envy doesn’t quite cover it, as there is no sense of misery and too much sense of covetousness. The nameless phenomenon is an odd absence in English.

I propose, then, what is essentially (schadenfreude)-1: freudenschade, ‘finding misery in the pleasure of others.’ ((This probably means the body of English words is not an abelian group: commutivity of multiplication is violated.)) I know you feel it; why not speak it now, too?

[silence]

Sunday, November 2nd, 2008

Explaining the particulars of my loveless love life to the general public is creepy and probably libel-worthy. (Whining on the overall subject of girl angst, totally different story.) But sometimes I encounter Date Conversations From Hell, and those scream for publication.

[She explains how her dad quit his job to move to Austin.]

Me: So what does your dad do now?

Her: Nothing.

Me: Oh, so he’s got it made, then?

Her: No, he’s dead.

[silence]

I

Wednesday, August 27th, 2008

This person’s personal ad on Austin craigslist didn’t turn out so good; it was flagged for removal within minutes. Emphasis mine:

I am looking for friendship leading to possible ltr.     I love to go out and have fun with friends, I love the clots and UofL football

Look, lady, it’s OK to love triple cheeseburgers, but you’re not required to love the heart bypasses that come along with them.

Group Hug

Thursday, March 27th, 2008

Group Hug is to me what comfort food is to most others. When I’m feeling lousy (an increasingly common emotion) I go to Group Hug and remember that other people have screwed their lives up far, far worse. I haven’t cheated in relationships. I don’t cut myself. I haven’t fallen in love with past or present bosses.

Many scenarios painted there are fake, but I have had trouble distinguishing between the site’s truth and fiction. It doesn’t matter. Even if the site were 100% lies, it would be a digital soap opera, one that I can appreciate, one that still has its roots firmly planted in feasibility. Television soaps long ago gave up on recycled reality and have since found suspension of disbelief to be an acceptable crutch. For a good time, I recommend reading weekly soap opera summaries found in many newspapers.

Woe and Tell

Saturday, January 26th, 2008

Apologies for the two-week hiatus. In the interim I moved to a bloody nice apartment and got a cell phone. Owning a cell phone is like being shackled to a wall that displays pretty blinking lights and keeps track of everyone you’ve ever known, and then charges you for the novelty.

It was also a rocky couple of weeks, especially with women. The morning after learning what I already knew was not cheerful, which was why I was very thankful to have accidentally discovered medicine in the form of Mortified: Woe and Tell. A combination of FOUND Magazine and Teen Angst Poetry, people send in the love letters and anecdotes they would otherwise prefer no one knew about. Simultaneously hilarious and curative.

Only If They're Alive

Tuesday, November 13th, 2007

I’m still experimenting with online dating. My tastes are in a constant cycle of repulsion (as was my tenure at plentyoffish.com) and sincere hope. OKCupid is pretty neat with all their doodads, but sincere hope is definitely not in the pipeline when their personality evaluation includes the question:

Would you ever consider having sex in a graveyard?

What the…? Christ, I don’t know. There are many nouns both proper and general that I really haven’t considered. Would I have sex in a monastery? A Chick-Fil-A? The U.S.S. Constellation? Some are great for dares, some need payment in advance to convince me.

With my uncanny ability to make anything into a Web 2.0 system (I humbly call it a super power), a thought just struck me. What if there were a wiki cataloging people’s sexual escapades in every possible place? For every noun, there is an article. Post a story, a picture, whatever is necessary to corroborate. Whether the point of this theoretical wiki is to create ridiculously organised reality pr0n—it’s not—this database would act as the launchpad for XKCD’s Rule 34 and Rule 35 of the Internet. More effectively, even, than wetriffs.com, which is directly inspired from XKCD’s Rule 34/35.

Before I’m decried as a filthy, filthy pr0n purveyor, I assure you it was a novelty idea. It is an Einsteinian ‘thought experiment’ regarding society’s greatest vice: just as no one will be sending twins out into space, I pray no one will have the time or energy to expend on a dictionary of sex locations.

Some dictionary ideas work, like odd Mormon names. Most don’t, like the importance of every number under an arbitrary ceiling. (Hint: ‘the largest known number n that makes 72n – 71n prime’ will not floor many people.) Let’s get through Web 2.0 alive by avoiding the latter.